IRS Story Unravels; Liberty Lost

May 15, 2013 7:52 AMViews: 283

IRS Story Unravels; Liberty Lost

By Paul Gable

The initial story from the IRS regarding alleged targeting of conservative groups has fallen apart. These actions go well beyond one or several low level employees acting on their own.

According to a report from the IRS Inspector General’s office, senior officials at the IRS knew about the targeting of conservative groups for over a year without doing anything about it.

Every new revelation makes this whole caper seem more and more politically motivated regardless of what the Obama administration says.

[poll id=”2″]

Yesterday we heard that at least one organization in South Carolina, the Laurens County Tea Party, was one of the many organizations having problems with the IRS. The group applied for tax-exempt status in 2010 and still has received no answer.

Yesterday we also heard that the Justice Department had begun an investigation into the actions of the IRS. This would be the same Justice Department that performed warrantless searches on the phone records of several reporters at the Associated Press.

If government officials don’t respect the laws of the United States and the provisions of the Constitution, who will?

Richard Nixon once told us the president was allowed to break the law in order to uphold the law. He wasn’t just talking about his administration. He was talking about what came before and what has come since.

The attitude in Washington, especially among administration officials of both parties, appears to be the law doesn’t apply to them.

And each succeeding administration in this century has attempted to increasingly hide knowledge about what is was doing.

Among other provisions, the 1917 Espionage Act, at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, attempted to silence critics of the government and legalize censorship of the press. The censorship provision was defeated by one vote, but much of the act remained.

One of the key provisions of the act deals with delivering information about ‘national defense’ to persons not ‘entitled to have it.’

Initially passed as an attempt to combat foreign spies, the act, unfortunately, has been applied more against government whistleblowers than spies.

The Obama administration has charged more persons under the provisions of this act than the total charged by all the administrations that have come before, since Wilson.

Before this latest IRS scandal is through, look for this administration to move more strongly against the whistleblowers that brought this targeting to light than against those who performed it.

Such, unfortunately, is the way of our government today.

In 1775, Ben Franklin told the Continental Congress, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Since at least September 11, 2001, the American people have stood passively by while the government has tramped all over our liberties in the name of protecting the American people.

Once an administration begins down the path of “protecting the American people”, past history tell us silencing its critics comes naturally.

It certainly appears that the IRS targeting of conservative groups was an attempt to silence critics of the current administration.

I submit the most basic liberty in a democracy is the right to criticize government actions, officials and the like. Our Founding Fathers thought so even though succeeding administrations have not necessarily agreed.

We are not one bit safer from terrorist acts today than we were on September 1o, 2001, but we have considerably less liberty of action. Think about it.

Just because IRS apologized doesn’t mean they did anything wrong…

POLL: Most Want IRS Officials Fired or Jailed… Developing…

REPORT: Agency demanded list of students trained by conservative group…

FRANKLIN GRAHAM: WE WERE TARGETED…

Rev. Billy Graham Endorsed Romney…

‘Special unit’ went after pro-Israel Jewish groups…

Official speedily approved exemption for Obama’s brother’s ‘charity’…

Agency won’t say if it will comply with congressional demand…

Tags:

Leave a Reply