Loftis and the High Cost of Political Courage

February 7, 2012 9:19 AM 6 comments Views: 320

Curtis Loftis and the High Cost of Political Courage

RACHEL BROWNE PHOTOGRAPHY (Click to Enlarge)

Latest Update Via FITSNews >> Sources: Ryberg Was Offered Loftis’ Job

A SCHotline, Grand Strand Daily Exclusive

By Paul Gable

What happens when a newly elected South Carolina official tries to bring openness and accountability to the management of the state’s retirement system investment commission?

He finds himself in the news after “documents” are leaked, to the Associated Press, in which a possible “pay to play” scheme is mentioned and a SLED investigation is requested by the SC Attorney General’s office.

Looking at it another way, S.C. Treasurer Curtis Loftis finds himself in a political knife fight for trying to buck South Carolina’s “good ol’ boy” system.

Loftis has been a critic of the management of the state’s pension fund for much of his 13 months as treasurer. On January 31, 2012, Loftis outlined problems associated with the pension fund during testimony to the Senate Finance Retirement Committee.

Among those problems, Loftis listed the $26 billion pension fund is underfunded by approximately $13 billion dollars (33%) in order to meet its future liabilities; full-time employees of the pension system have risen from three in 2006 to 23 currently; investment management fees have rocketed from $31 million in 2005 to $343 million 2011 and the fund has consistently underperformed with respect to similar pension funds in other states over the past five years.

One day later, the Associated Press broke the story “Pay for Play scheme probed at state’s $25 billion retirement system”. The first paragraph said SLED had launched an investigation while the second paragraph read, “The investigation was started after at least two financial management firms said they were promised they could manage a piece of the retirement fund, earning lucrative fees, if they paid money to a friend of state Treasurer Curtis Loftis.”

The documents, linked at the bottom of this story, date back to November 15, 2011, a time when retirement system CEO/CFO Robert Borden was under fire from Loftis for his outrageous salary ($485,000 per yr.) and Lamborghini driving flamboyancy while overseeing the underperforming agency. Borden resigned the next month after five years on the job.

And here’s one of my favorite parts. Loftis, a member of the SCRSIC, was not allowed to have documentation of Borden’s hotel, travel and entertainment expenses without filing a Freedom of Information Act request to the commission to produce them. This FOIA delay made sure Loftis would only see what information Borden and his commission cronies wanted him to see.

Over Loftis’ objections, the SC Retirement System Investment Commission acted on a recommendation by Chairman Allen Gillespee to give Borden a bonus of $80,000 upon his departure.

Why does this smell so bad? The investment commission allegedly received two sets of phone call notes from 11/15/2011 transcribed by Ashli Aslin (Doc. A below) and Rhett Humphreys (Doc. B). Both Aslin and Humphreys are employees of New England Pension Consultants, an investment firm with connections to the SCRSIC. Additionally, Humphreys was Borden’s number two man when both worked for the Louisiana state employees retirement system prior to Borden coming to South Carolina and Humphreys moving to NEPC.

NEPC – SCRSIC Documents

While many names are redacted from the two documents, the only name to remain unredacted in the two documents is Mallory Factor, a friend and supporter of Loftis. Factor is an investment consultant located in Charleston for the past five years after a long career in New York City. Why is Factor’s name the only one not redacted in the documents?

The two sets of phone notes allegedly prompted the investment commission to ask its attorney to contact the Office of the Attorney General (Doc. C). After receiving the SCRSIC letter, John McIntosh of the Attorney General’s office sent a letter to SLED chief Mark Keel requesting an investigation of the “pay to play” scheme (Doc D).

Pay to play is traditionally defined as: the payer (an individual, business, or organization) makes campaign contributions to public officials, party officials, or parties themselves, and receives political or pecuniary benefit such as no-bid government contracts, influence over legislation, political appointments or nominations, special access or other favors.

According to a source familiar with the investigation, it took SLED over two months to contact Factor whom it interviewed for approximately one hour last Thursday (2/2). Why did it take so long for SLED to contact Factor and why did this occur after the story leak of a supposedly two month old investigation?

The Associated Press story says the documents show two investment companies reported suspicious calls that sought payment to Factor. This is not true. Both sets of notes mention a “third party investment firm” but it is certainly not clear whether it is the same firm or a different firm in each set of notes. In fact, it is even possible that Aslin’s notes are nothing more than a shortened compilation of Humphreys’ notes. Both work at New England Pension Consultants and we only have their story to back up that either received a phone call at all.

What exactly in either of these sets of notes justifies a conclusion that there are possible violations of law or that the phone conversations even occurred?

Only Humphrey’s notes mention a payout to Factor. Humphreys’ notes also mention a call to RW, believed to be SCRSIC Vice Chairman and Chairman Emeritus Reynolds Williams, who was chairman when Borden was hired. Williams last week was quoted in The State newspaper as saying “there should not be a politician on the commission,” an obvious reference to Loftis.

What Williams, Gillespee, McIntosh and Co. failed to remember here is neither Factor nor Loftis could orchestrate a pay to play scheme with the investment commission. Factor is in no way a public figure and Loftis is merely one vote on the commission as shown by his failed attempt to deny a bonus to Borden. Neither have the authority or control to guarantee “play” if “pay” is received. Loftis is the political target and Factor is collateral damage in today’s parlance.

Williams was friends with Borden. Borden worked with Humphreys in Louisiana. Borden goes to SCRSIC and Humphreys goes to NEPC, a firm that has connections with the SC pension fund.

Loftis becomes dissatisfied with the performance of the retirement fund under Borden’s management. Borden loses his high paying job. Humphreys with Borden’s ouster sees the loss of a $600,000 fee from the SCRSIC in the near future.

SLED under Haley appointee Mark Keel commences an investigation of Loftis and Factor based on very shaky “evidence” in the alleged documents.

It’s a perfect South Carolina political storm with SLED, as usual, off investigating the wrong allegations and the wrong people, successfully performing its political function in the state while ignoring its supposed law enforcement function.

Haley worries about Loftis being a threat to her re-election as governor as she well should. In his election victory for Treasurer, Loftis captured all 46 South Carolina counties, winning a whopping 62 percent of the vote.

NEPC – SCRSIC Documents

Paul Gable is a veteran investigative reporter residing in Horry County, South Carolina and is the current editor of the Grand Strand Daily an online magazine featuring all things local and political.

Latest Update >> Sources: Ryberg Was Offered Loftis’ Job

Update >>

AG, SLED Sources: Loftis In The Clear

Be Sociable, Share!

6 Comments

  • Dr. Dave Klapmeier

    When there is documented illegal activities, why is the crooked SLED man’s Mark Keel name always appearing? The level of corruption as evidenced by this case and the Southern Holdings case is absolute proof positive that there is a big problem and the politicians are laughing all the way to the bank!!

  • Great piece Mr. Gable, maybe the major S.C. print factories could hire you to train the twenty-something “journalists” a thing or two about investigating and then reporting with some true journalistic integrity vs. the regurgitated baseless crap we are becoming all too familiar with digesting.

  • Oh, ha ha ha ha. Y’all should be careful.

  • I am 100% behind Mr. Loftis. It is OUR money ad not the good old boys. It is our money, not the fat cats in Columbia and Columbia.

    We need more people like Mr. Loftis, and I hope we get him help during the next election.

  • This is the Good Old Boy establishment rising up to take an honest man out. It has happened before and will happen again.
    I hope Mr. Loftis is strong enough to stand tall. Courage is not something we find mush of in our politicians,

  • You guys are still cracking me up. Watch for the real details to be different from what you think now.

Leave a Reply


Trackbacks

Other News

  • Feature Grand Strand Daily S.C. Courts S.C. Politics Election Commission Says NO to Shealy

    Election Commission Says NO to Shealy

    The South Carolina Election Commission negated the SCGOP decision last night to place Katrina Shealy on the upcoming June 12th primary ballot for Senate District 23.

    According to a press release issued Thursday, the Election Commission is holding certification of candidates to the May 4, 2012 date set by the S.C. Supreme Court May 2nd.

    “Under order of the S.C. Supreme Court, state and county political parties were required to provide the state and county election commissions with an updated list of candidates who properly filed for office by noon, May 4th,” reads the commission website.

    “As an agency of the State of South Carolina, the State Election Commission has no authority to accept additional candidates after the May 4, 2012 noon deadline set by the Supreme Court,” said the commission in a press release.

    Read more →
  • Feature Governor Nikki Haley S.C. Politics Nikki Haley Overrules S.C. Supreme Court

    Nikki Haley Overrules S.C. Supreme Court

    By a vote of 26-0, an SCGOP Executive Committee placed Katrina Shealy back on the June 12th primary ballot for Senate District 23.

    Shealy was the fourth of five candidates whose protests were heard by the committee. She was the only one successful in reversing a former decision about her certification for the ballot.

    The entire candidate filing controversy has been pinned to Shealy’s opponent, incumbent Sen. Jakie Knotts who, reportedly, had someone challenge Shealy’s filing in a lawsuit heard by the S.C. Supreme Court with original jurisdiction of the case.

    The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit in ruling on a strict interpretation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-1356(B).

    Read more →
  • 2012 Governor Nikki Haley POTUS S.C. Politics Despite Primary Loss, SC in Mitt’s Corner

    Despite Primary Loss, SC in Mitt’s Corner

    Haley, in an appearance in Greenville on Monday, said that she does not think (Mauldin Patch) Mitt Romney and South Carolina voters have never been a very good match. Whether it is the former Massachusetts governor’s religion or his lack of consistency on issues that matter to the Palmetto State’s overwhelmingly conservative electorate, Romney just hasn’t aroused much passion. He finished a distant fourth in the 2008 South Carolina Primary with 15 percent of the vote. This year, as the [...]

    Read more →
  • 2012 POTUS Obama’s Budget Fails in Senate: 99-0

    Obama’s Budget Fails in Senate: 99-0

    Obama’s Budget Fails in Senate: 99-0 (TWS) Senate Democrats and Republicans unanimously rejected President Obama’s proposed budget this afternoon. The final vote tally was 99-0. Likewise, the House also unanimously rejected the budget in March. Prior to the vote, Senate Budget Committee ranking member Jeff Sessions blasted the budget. “It was voted 414-0 in the House this year,” said Sessions. I suspect in an hour or so it will go down again on the floor of the Senate by unanimous [...]

    Read more →
  • Feature S.C. Politics Haley Consultant Resurrects Raghead

    Haley Consultant Resurrects Raghead

    Haley’s inner circles are as giddy as preschoolers at an ice cream social, having successfully shopped video footage of Jake’s so-called infamous preprimaries raghead remark in 2010 or so we are told. The not so curiously timed release of the video footage coincides with the full S.C. House poised to re-consider ethics complaints against Gov. Nikki Haley. The video was reportedly and successfully shopped to Buzzfeed, an online aggregator of all thing’s video by Haley’s D.C. Consultant Jon Lerner. What remains to be seen is whether or not the rerelease will retain any leg, our guess is it will not, in our opinion this really never evolved into Jake’s Jimmy the Greek moment.

    Most interestingly and or not is that it appears not one of the participants in the episode Pub Politics calls the senator out on his remarks, instead they just sit there looking uncomfortably into their beer, waiting, for the moment, to pass, see for yourself here.

    Read more →
  • S.C. Politics School Choice SC Senate Must Be Champions Of Change

    SC Senate Must Be Champions Of Change

    Recently, it was an honor to welcome former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush to South Carolina for the Empower Education Reform Summit (click HERE to see video of Gov. Bush’s talk).

    The event was an uplifting opportunity to hear the story of Florida’s hard-won public education renaissance and exciting, bipartisan innovations happening all around the country: innovations that are producing measurable gains in achievement for incredibly diverse student populations.

    An educated citizenry is the foundation of our Republic and the cornerstone of our future economic competitiveness. South Carolina is a great place to do business, realizing incredible gains in skilled manufacturing jobs from BMW, Michelin, Boeing, Continental, Bridgestone and many, many others. Yet businesses routinely share with me their concern over a shortage of available, qualified workers.

    This cannot stand in South Carolina. And I’m confident it won’t.

    Read more →
  • Exclusives Feature Governor Nikki Haley State Ethics Committee Violated State Law

    State Ethics Committee Violated State Law

    The appeal of Republican operative John Rainey to House Speaker Bobby Harrell asking the full House to re-consider ethics complaints against Gov. Nikki Haley, for actions when she was a House member, virtually screams for an investigation to be opened.

    The fact that stands out most in Rainey’s appeal is that just minutes before voting 5-1 to dismiss an ethics complaint by Rainey against Haley, the House Ethics Committee voted unanimously that probable cause existed to investigate the complaint.

    S.C. Code of Laws Section 8-13-540 states, “If the ethics committee determines complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a violation, it shall promptly investigate the alleged violation and may compel by subpoena the testimony of witnesses and the production of pertinent books and papers.”

    In failing to investigate the complaint and, instead, voting to dismiss it, the ethics committee violated state law. There doesn’t appear the committee is allowed any discretion in this decision as the law plainly states “shall promptly investigate.”

    Read more →
  • Governor Nikki Haley S.C. Politics S.C. House To Reopen Nikki Haley Investigation?

    S.C. House To Reopen Nikki Haley Investigation?

    BIPARTISAN PUSH COULD LEAD TO FIRST REAL PROBE INTO ETHICS ALLEGATIONS

    “Haley’s everyone-is-doing-it defense stains the integrity of this body and all honest public servants,” – John Rainey

    (FITSNews)

    Republicans and Democrats in the S.C. House of Representatives are on the verge of reopening an ethics investigation into S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley, multiple sources at the S.C. State House have confirmed to FITS. In fact a resolution sponsored by S.C. Rep. James Smith (D-Columbia) would direct the House Ethics Commission to reopen its inquiry into allegations that Haley illegally lobbied on behalf of at least one of her employers (and committed numerous other ethical lapses).

    Read more →
  • Feature S.C. Politics School Choice Treasurer Curtis Loftis Curtis Loftis: Expand the boundaries of choice

    Curtis Loftis: Expand the boundaries of choice

    Across the state, I meet people worried about their local schools.

    Parents worry about dropout rates, job placement, and college admission. Employers worry about workforce qualification and training. Local officials worry about the costs of services required by those who’ve slipped through the cracks. Faith and community leaders worry about poverty and inequality.

    As the state’s chief financial officer, I see a more eminent concern: unchecked, the traditional model of public education in South Carolina will bankrupt the state within our lifetime.

    K-12 education now consumes a third of all state government spending and nearly two-thirds of local government spending. Taxpayers will provide South Carolina’s public schools with over $8 billion next year. The figure, taken from the state budget, only includes money for day-to-day operations. Spending on buildings, retirement, and other long-term obligations could bring the total closer to $10 billion.

    Read more →
  • U.S. Constitution U.S. Politics Lindsey Graham’s Inquisition

    Lindsey Graham’s Inquisition

    On December 31, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2012, codifying indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history.

    So, Happy New Year, y’all! The NDAA’s detention provisions would authorize the president – and all future presidents – to order the military to pick up and indefinitely imprison people captured anywhere in the world, even American citizens, far from any battlefield. This would be a good point at which to remind ourselves of Amendments 4, 5, and 6 to the U.S. Constitution here and attempt to reconcile this law with them.

    Can’t do it? There’s a reason for that – it can’t be done.

    Read more →
  • 2012 Congressional District 7 S.C. Politics Florence’s Jordan tops poll at 7th CD Debate

    Florence’s Jordan tops poll at 7th CD Debate

    A crowd of more than 500 piled into the West Florence High School auditorium Monday night to hear what the Republicans seeking their party’s nomination for the 7th Congressional District race had to say – and to cast some of the first votes in that contentious race.

    The event’s unique forum, which was driven at least in part by the fact that the race in the brand new district has attracted so many candidates (9 Republicans, 5 Democrats), called for 45 minutes of debate followed by a straw vote to select five candidates for 45 minutes of debate. A final, post-debate poll was supposed to reveal how the crowd felt after hearing both halves of the show.

    Apparently it was feeling pretty pro-Pee Dee.

    Read more →
  • Feature Retarded Monkeys S.C. Courts S.C. Politics Federal Judges Reject Kincannon Lawsuit

    Federal Judges Reject Kincannon Lawsuit

    Election ballot issues shifted from the court room to the living room Monday when a federal three judge panel threw out the lawsuit challenging the continuing candidate certification issues for upcoming Republican and Democratic primaries throughout the state.

    The complaint said military personnel serving overseas should have 45 days before the election to receive, fill out and return their ballots. Absentee ballots for federal elections, Congressional races this year, were sent 45 days prior to the election, according to the S.C. Election Commission.

    A separate ballot, containing names for state and local candidates was sent later, after the S.C. Supreme Court decision eliminated nearly 200 candidates from certification two weeks ago. The complaint argued the splitting of the ballots was illegal under election law.

    The Election Commission argued the 45 day rule only applied to federal elections, which was met, and that the state had split ballots in prior elections due to the necessity of certifying state and local candidates later than federal candidates.

    Read more →
GetRank - Webmaster and Seo Tools